Quick Search

   
Thursday, November 20, 2008

Using PRINCE2 for the PRINCE2: 2009 Project – Lead Author, Andy Murray, Explains the Quality Approach

  • 23 May 2008 10:35
  • by Andy Murray

In PRINCE2, quality is a question of identifying what it is about the project’s products or services that make them fit for their purpose. It starts with understanding the Customer’s Quality Expectations, then agreeing Acceptance Criteria for the project and in turn agreeing the Quality Criteria for each product.

For the PRINCE2: 2009 Project the Customer’s Quality Expectations were identified through six months of public consultation with users, examiners, trainers, consultants, tool vendors and academics.  Based on the public consultation, OGC defined the Acceptance Criteria to which the efforts of the authoring team will be judged.

As an authoring team we are constantly asking ourselves, "Is it what the users want and will our work meet the Acceptance Criteria?" These questions span the design, development and deployment activities. In particular they helped with producing the Product Descriptions for the project’s major products. Product Descriptions include statements on the product’s Quality Criteria. These define the basis against which each product will be judged as being fit for purpose. However, Quality Criteria alone is not enough as we also need to understand how they will be proven. In PRINCE2 this is known as the quality checking method.

By way of example, an extract from the Product Description for the revised “Managing Successful Projects Using PRINCE2” publication is shown below. 
Quality Criteria Quality Checking Method Skills Required
The guidance must be generic – applicable to any size of organisation, any industry, anywhere in the world Design Review PRINCE2 Expert
Pilots – small to large Users
Pilots – public to private Users
Pilots – multiple cultures Users
Inspection Users
(1) Intuitive and (2) logical (1) User Demonstration Users
(2) Design Review PRINCE2 Expert
Written in plain English and idiom free Inspection Translation ExpertNon-British Practitioner
Survey/consultation Users
The publication is the sole source for the exam syllabus Proof of Concept Examiner

 

There are 14 quality criteria for this product in total.  They were derived from the project’s Acceptance Criteria and the product’s purpose.  The choice of quality checking method is based on identifying the most effective way of being able to reasonably prove that the product meets the specific Quality Criteria. For the PRINCE2: 2009 Project we are using the following quality checking methods:
  • Design Reviews - a peer level review (perhaps by workshop) of the design documents
  • Pilots - the application of the method by an end user on a particular project
  • User Demonstrations - used to verify (perhaps by workshop) user understanding of the method
  • Surveys/Consultations - gauges opinion and perception
  • Proof of Concepts - used to assess the viability of a requirement
  • Inspections - a review of the publication to judge its conformity to requirements by users and experts.

To date we have held surveys/consultations, design reviews and inspection (of the first draft).  We are currently in the process of writing the second draft to address the recommendations from the quality activities undertaken and several pilots of the revised method are underway.  The pilots are particularly important as we are changing some aspects of the method and we need to ensure that what looks right on paper also works in practice!

As can be seen our approach to quality is not reliant solely on ‘inspection’ taking place at the end of the authoring process (a criticism of previous refreshes) but on a set of quality checking methods through its design, development and deployment.  Our path to quality takes an iterative approach with quality activities taking place throughout the project’s life: each one providing an opportunity for improving the delivered product to ensure that we not only meet its Quality Criteria but the Customer’s Quality Expectations too.   

Comments

The ideas discussed here and in the slideshow presentation about Prince2 2009 are very promising!

I noticed that -in the slideshow - reference is made to technologies of other Body of Knowledge's. Could you indicate in which way this reference is made and to what extend? Will there also be linked to PMI -PMP?

Thank you in advance.

The slideshow makes reference to ‘techniques’ from other Bodies of Knowledge such as PMI's PMBoK, ISO9000, APM’s BoK and various frameworks/models around the human factor (e.g. leadership styles, team forming etc).

Each reference is by way of example and it intentionally not meant to be exhaustive. The reason for the references is to emphasise the point that there is more to project management than the application of a method. The project will have a greater chance of success if the people involved with the project are cognisant of these techniques.


It is laudable to try to use PRINCE2 to develop PRINCE2. A few questions:

- Are there high-level "products" you can post as you go along, e.g. the PID, the project plan etc?

- You mentioned that 6 months consultation took place with "users, examiners, trainers, consultants, tool vendors and academics". Are the details of the consultation available somewhere (eg: the consultation documents, the written responses etc)?

- Most importantly, are there independent and in-depth empirical studies of how PRINCE2 have been used that will feed into the new version?

Good luck,

AR

  • 02 Aug 2008 01:35
  • by Angus Ross

In response to your questions Angus: some of the products (as the two you highlight - the PID and the project plan) contain commercially sensitive information but we are making others available. For example, on this website you will find the mandate, public consultation, scoping document, product descriptions, and a presentation outlining the changes to PRINCE2 2009. The details of the consultation are available in the Public Consultation Report which is available to download from this website.

The National Audit Office have conducted two studies of how PRINCE2 has been used that will feed into the new version: one in 2001 looking at reasons why major IT projects fail and another in 2007 looking at common characteristics of successful projects. Both these studies make recommendations on project management which have been incorporated into the revised method. The revised method also incorporates the findings of the 'Rethinking Project Management' research by a pan-Europe group of academics. We are also running pilots on the revised method so we can show that the revised method works in practice as well as on paper!

Following your response on August 5th, I tried to find the two NAO studies you mentioned. I am aware of various NAO reports into IT projects and public procurement that may mention Prince2 (eg: NAO, 2002, "Better Public Services through e-government"; NAO 2006, "Delivering successful IT-enabled business change"Wink but they are not really studies of "how PRINCE2 has been used". Since the dates of publication don't tie up either, I guess I have not found the right reports. Could you kindly highlight the NAO reports titles and urls if they are available? Many thanks. AR

  • 05 Sep 2008 06:20
  • by Angus Ross

Add comment


 





Important Information

An OGC website managed and published by TSO